Monday 11 November 2013

Question 5 Prove it!

Match the photos of the victims’ pieces of evidence, explaining your rationale for doing so. 
Match the following :P
So, from all the evidences that have been collected so far, we can try to match it with the missing person

Firstly ,for the child jaw.

Evidence 1 BELONGS TO
 Anya Suriati ( 9 years old twins )=D


SO now, WHY do we say so?
Its because, this jaw represent a child jaw. And from the missing person list, Anya Suriati is the only child in the missing person list.
2. Anya is a nine years old child. And from the picture above, we can see that there's a canine remain in the lower jaw. In tooth eruption , we knew that the canine erupted during 9-10 years.
So, from these we can sure that this jaw belongs to Anya Suriati. Do you agree?


Next,for the skull and jaw,
Evidence 2 & 3  BELONGS TO
HERMAN HARTONO & ADI HARTONO

For evidence 2 and 3, we couldn't differentiate whether its belongs to Herman Hartono, or his son Adi Hartono.Because both are adults who above 17 years old.
But, the thing that we can confirm that is, both jaw and skull are belong to adult, as it contains third molar at the lower jaw, which erupt during 17-21 years old.
And, it also made clear that this jaw and skull belong to  male , as we confused the gender of the skull during previous investigations.


Conclusion for this, Child jaw  => ANYA SURIATI
                              Adult's jaws and skull    => either HERMAN HARTONO / ADI HARTONO


1 comment: